"China's First Avant-Garde Composer and One of the Most Original Composers of His Generation"

 NYT logo

Excerpts From The New York Times Feature
 
 Intrepid Journeys Lead to Ambitious Works
 
 By VIVIEN SCHWEITZER

 

Angel Franco/The New York Times - The composer Ge Gan-Ru at his home in Saddle River, N.J.

Angel Franco/The New York Times - The composer Ge Gan-Ru at his home in Saddle River, N.J.

NEARLY all composers have had unflattering adjectives hurled at them, but Ge Gan-Ru was actually deemed insane by Chinese authorities after the Shanghai premiere, in 1982, of his “Yi Feng” (“Lost Style”), a radical work for detuned cello that uses Western experimental techniques to convey traditional Chinese sounds. Yet Mr. Ge, 55, who endured far worse abuse while growing up during the Cultural Revolution, managed to survive the brickbats and go on to build a thriving, if highly iconoclastic, career in the West.

The CD cover of Mr. Ge’s “Fall of Baghdad” (2009)

The CD cover of Mr. Ge’s “Fall of Baghdad” (2009)

Mr. Ge, a gregarious, talkative man who laughs frequently, prefers to dwell on the benefits of his long, unconventional road to success. “I feel I am more free, more mature, and there is more humanity in my music,” he said over coffee recently at a restaurant near Central Park.

That humanity and individualism are evident in Mr. Ge’s gripping String Quartet No. 5 “Fall of Baghdad” (2007), given a mesmerizing performance by the ModernWorks Ensemble on a new release on the Naxos label.

The first movement of the work (a homage to George Crumb’s 1970 “Black Angels,” for amplified string quartet) is subtitled “Screaming — Living Hell — Barbaric March — Abyss — Threnody.” It lives up to those descriptions with a cacophonous, microtonal frenzy that subsides into a poignant melodic solemnity, echoed at the end of the second movement, “Music From Heaven.” In “Desolation,” the final section, which uses traditional and avant-garde techniques, the strings weep, growl and shudder until the stark conclusion. His String Quartet No. 4 “Angel Suite” (also featured on the Naxos disc) is similarly haunting.

Michael Dames - Margaret Leng Tan performing Mr. Ge’s “Wrong, Wrong, Wrong” (2006), a melodrama for voice based on a 12th-century poem.

Michael Dames - Margaret Leng Tan performing Mr. Ge’s “Wrong, Wrong, Wrong” (2006), a melodrama for voice based on a 12th-century poem.

Mr. Ge, who lives in Saddle River, N.J., grew up in a nonmusical family in Shanghai, where he studied violin. Sent to a farm after high school during the Cultural Revolution, he would rise at 5 a.m., work in the rice fields until around 8 p.m., then walk 45 minutes to practice in secret at a remote water station that offered electricity and privacy.

There was a respected violin teacher in the camp who took on Mr. Ge as a student after overcoming his initial reluctance to risk annoying the authorities. Soon after, camp leaders created an ensemble to play revolutionary songs, which Mr. Ge arranged using both Western and Chinese traditional instruments.

Following the Cultural Revolution he entered the Shanghai Conservatory as a violin major and switched to composition. As China began to open up, foreign musicians occasionally visited, sometimes leaving behind scores and tapes. Exposed to 12-tone music, Mr. Ge began composing in that style.

But it didn’t feel right. After experimenting with various idioms he said he felt frustrated. So he focused instead on the different elements of Western and Chinese music and the vastly different roles of rhythm, timbre, pitch and dynamics in each. “Lost Style” was his first work to feature his newly distinctive style. Unsurprisingly, given that the Chinese government encouraged a “Butterfly Lovers” ethos (a melodious violin concerto nicknamed the “Tchaikovsky Concerto of the East”), “Lost Style” was harshly criticized.

“We don’t have composers in Chinese history,” he explained. “The music we listen to is inherited, not created by an individual person.”

In 1983 Mr. Ge was invited to New York to study with Chou Wen-chung, a professor at Columbia University. He arrived at Kennedy International Airport at night with $40 (the maximum amount then allowed out of China), a violin, a box of his scores and one suitcase. Speaking little English, he hung around the airport with no idea where to go. (A bystander took pity on him and offered him a bed for the night.)

“I was very naïve,” he said. “We were not exposed to any commercial things, so I thought it was a great opportunity to study and I never thought about money.” After a week of subsisting on bread and water, he eventually found work delivering Chinese food.

“It was very tough, but musically it was even tougher,” he added, describing years of disorientation at Columbia while studying for a doctorate. He thought about quitting, but needed his student visa to remain in New York.

In 1989, he and his wife, Vivian Ge, an accordion player whom he met in the labor camp, founded a business, now called Peony Online, which provides information on the market for metals. “I thought in six months I’d be rich and go back to composing,” he said, adding, “I was not really interested in business, but if I do one thing I try to finish it.” After the company became successful, Mr. Ge began composing again full time around 2000.

He soon wrote texturally ambitious works like “Four Studies of Peking Opera” (2003) for piano and string quartet, in which he evokes the genre with a prepared piano, glissandos and pizzicatos and demonstrates considerable gifts as a melodist. Emotive string melodies are underpinned by percussion from the prepared piano in “Aria,” the second movement, which begins in an otherworldly trance and crescendos to a passionate, theatrical climax.

Unlike many of his Chinese colleagues Mr. Ge does not write for traditional Chinese instruments. “To me it’s a label,” he said, adding that he has lost commissions because of this. He also doesn’t “chase big stars” to play his works. “I know if they play my music, it can get more popular, but I look at it the other way,” he said. “I have more freedom and can write whatever I want.” The conductor José Serebrier, who recorded Mr. Ge’s “Chinese Rhapsody” (1992) and “Six Pentatonic Tunes” with the Royal Scottish National Orchestra on the BIS label, maintains that Mr. Ge’s music is “very approachable.”

“He has all the contemporary sounds but done in such a way that are appealing to both sophisticated and unsophisticated ears,” he added. His music is “immediately recognizable” and “communicates on all levels.”

The colorful, propulsive “Chinese Rhapsody,” whose timbre is enhanced by complex percussion, demonstrates Mr. Ge’s prowess as an orchestrator. The disc also includes Mr. Serebrier conducting the pianist Margaret Leng Tan in the explosive “Wu” (“Rising to the Heights”). She uses the piano in a conventional manner and strikes and plucks its strings to evoke a Chinese steel zither, creating sonorous timbres within the shimmering orchestral fabric. A coming disc on BIS features a flute concerto and an orchestral suite.

Ms. Tan, a specialist in prepared piano and toy piano performance, also recorded the startling “Wrong, Wrong, Wrong” (2006), a Beijing-opera-inspired melodrama for voice based on a 12th-century poem. She wails and whispers and accompanies herself with an orchestra of toy instruments and gadgets.

Mr. Ge “allows me a lot of creative participation in the projects and challenges my own creative resources,” she said, and that reflects “a certain deep inner confidence on his part.”

“He’s so pragmatic, very Chinese in that sense, very down to earth and yet creates these amazing works,” she added.

During his years away from the music scene Mr. Ge tried to forget about composition, but couldn’t. “It’s not for fame,” he said, “but somehow it becomes a part of you.”


 The Gramophone

 
Ge Gan-ru on His Musical Upbringing and Influences 
 
                                                 Interview by Barry Witherden

‘I was brought up with Chinese music, but in my teens I learned about Western music, so when I started to compose there was always a kind of contradiction in my mind; I wanted to find my own identity whilst keeping close to my Chinese heritage.

‘As students we were only really allowed to arrange folk tunes rather than compose original music. I wanted to create, not just arrange, but it was difficult because there wasn’t that tradition and because of the political issue. You were expected to write for political purposes, not to express yourself.
 
‘Until 1983′s Yi Feng (‘Lost Style’) for cello, I wrote in various styles, including 12-tone, but then realized I needed to find my own voice. The trouble was, I didn’t know what that would be. I heard Cage and Crumb and that was closer to what I felt. Some Western people hear Cage as very Eastern, but to me he’s very Western. For example, the preparations he does to the piano are still based on logic: when Western music uses microtones it’s still dividable. In Chinese usage there’s no insistence on a formula. You can move from more or less any pitch to any other pitch. It’s like experimenting with each note.
 
‘I compare basic elements common to Western and Chinese music: pitch, duration, timbre, dynamics. In Western music, pitches are very precise, very organised, and you seek the perfect sound according to the logic of physics, but in China there is no ideal. For Yi Feng I focused on the non-Western elements. I didn’t write specific pitches and retuned the cello an octave down to lose the Western associations. It caused a lot of controversy, and for a while the government gave me a hard time, but I wasn’t trying to make statement or to destroy anything, I was just seeking to write from my heart.’